|
Pentecost 13 Mark
7:1-23 (selectvss) 9/3/06
“Abandon Religion”
Those poor
unappreciated Pharisees! They’re always getting a bum rap!
Even Jesus doesn’t seem to love them.
We actually know very
little about the Pharisees historically. Scholars are not even
certain what the word “Pharisee” means. They were one of the
several sects of Judaism that existed for about two hundred
years before Christ and lasted for about a hundred years after
the resurrection. They also were not the strictest sect, and
were even seen by some as too liberal.
While the writers of the
Gospels paint them in a very negative light, making them Jesus’
chief enemies, other writers of the time express a much higher
opinion of them. In fact, even Paul seems to have held them in
regard as he expresses some pride in having been a Pharisee
prior to his conversion.
What seems to be generally
agreed upon by historians is that they were deeply and sincerely
religious. They were admired by the people. They were never
great in numbers or political power. Most surely, they were
experts on the laws and traditions of the Jewish faith and
practiced a truly strict observance of the faith.
Since the followers of
Jesus were also originally a sect of Judaism and worshipped
in synagogues, we can imagine the tensions that would have
developed between the two sects.
The Pharisees provided an
important and useful function in their religion. They were the
keepers of the tradition and models for the living out of the
faith.
As is often the case
though, the Pharisees took a good act too far and lost a
necessary balance. The Law had been understood originally as a
gift from a loving God. It was intended to help the people of
Israel become a community and be in relationship with God and
each other. The Pharisees were keepers of the law and also
sought to preserve the Jewish identity by emphasis on the
traditions of the elders. But, these were human traditions, not
meant to be given the same weight as the Law. Thus, the Law
became a club and tradition became a religion.
This is the conflict we
see in our Gospel lesson today. The Pharisees had made a
religion out of tradition and are being called to abandon
religion. Religion is not the beliefs handed down by God.
Religion is a system created by humans that they hope will make
them right with God. Jesus calls for an end to religion because
He will make people right with God and all people will
need to do to have this relationship is believe in Him.
The trouble though is that
tradition gives a sense of identity, security and continuity.
With so many different
conquerors and so many different cultures coming into Israel,
tradition helped the people, especially the Pharisees, maintain
their sense of being God’s special people. The prescribed
ceremonial/ritual activities are not just something the
observant did, they defined who they were. They made the people
different and special.
Tradition gives security.
Once one had learned the 600+ laws that comprised the tradition,
a person didn’t have to struggle with what is right and what is
wrong. And, to the degree that the law/tradition could be
maintained a person could feel secure in his relationship with
the Almighty.
Roots are important to all
people. For a people with a history of wandering and being
taken repeatedly into exile, some kind of continuity was vital.
While that continuity ultimately comes from belief in the true
God, some needed the traditions as a more visible form of
continuity or rootedness.
This is still true today,
and it is true in Christian denominations, with factions within
denominations and within individuals churches.
What is necessary to be
considered a Christian isn’t that complex or involved. It can
even be reduced to its basics with, “God so loved the world that
He gave His only Son that all who believe in Him shall not
perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16) Time could be
valuably spent considering what beyond that in our belief and
practice is necessary and what is adiaphora.
One of the great words
that came out of the Lutheran Reformation is “adiaphora”. It
means, “that which is neither commanded nor forbidden.” These
are beliefs and practices that have value, usually in terms of
giving a group a sense of identity and continuity, but God
doesn’t require them. As Lutherans we follow a certain order of
worship which we engage in normally on Sundays, use creeds and
liturgy, have ordained clergy, baptize babies, and teach
children in Sunday schools. These are important traditions, but
they are not absolutely necessary to being a Christian and when
given too much emphasis can take people away from the faith that
makes a relationship with God possible to the practicing of a
religion.
The importance of
tradition or adiaphora can become a matter of conflict within a
denomination when different regional, ethnic or cultural
traditions clash after a merger. Much of the trouble in the
ELCA in the last ten or twenty years is due to such a clash.
Centralized authority vs congregationalism, high church vs low
church, a literal interpretation of Scripture vs acceptance of
other factors effecting the writing – all of these traditions
have value, but can also turn Christianity into a religion.
And all of this takes
place in an individual congregation as well. Think of the
traditions we practice like, sugar waffles on the first day of
Sunday school, Christmas programs, Easter breakfast, the
Mother/Daughter banquet. Each contributes to our identity as
people of St. Paul’s, and our continuity with the past as well
as our sense of community. But, these along with other
traditions need to be held lightly so they do not become a
religion for us.
The day that any tradition
no matter how pleasurable or well rooted defines the people of
God as much as their faith or determines whether the church will
stand or fall, a religion has been established. The faithful
will then abandon that religion. We need to be watchful of our
traditions and celebrate those that add to who we are, but
discard those that no longer help us in our faithfulness to God.
I want to end with a story
about a group of the faithful who had another kind of tradition
that had become a religion for them. After you hear this story
consider whether there are any traditions that threaten to
become religions for us.
A new rabbi has arrived at the synagogue. Not long after his arrival an argument flares up between two groups.
One faction insists that they must pray standing up. The other responds that
prayer is offered while sitting.
They argue back and forth. Finally they decide to go to the new rabbi to hear what he has to say on the matter.
The rabbi hears their arguments then responds that he will study the issue and get back with them.
As he reflects to himself, he wonders about the tradition of the synagogue.
So he goes to the former rabbi who is now retired, explains that two groups are arguing about the proper attitude for prayer, and asks
what the tradition of the synagogue is.
The sage predecessor responds, "That is the tradition."
His younger colleague asks, "Which is the tradition?"
"That they argue about it."
|