Reformation              Jeremiah 31:31-34                       10/29/06
                        “Reformation or Restoration”
 
There’s a move afoot in recent years to de-emphasize the Reformation.  Those who prefer that we Lutherans avoid or at least, limit celebration of Reformation Sunday mean well. 
 
We live in an ecumenical age where our likeness to other denominations is being constantly highlighted.  Making a big deal of the Reformation and our identity as Lutherans undermines our ecumenical efforts, according to some. 
 
Also, I’ve heard the criticism that our emphasis on our Lutheran heritage tends to make us self-righteous and even bigoted.  Having grown up Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, I know how easy it is to believe that only we have the correct beliefs and be dismissive of the beliefs of others.  I don’t know if I’ll ever outgrow that attitude completely.
 
And finally, it’s pointed out that this isn’t our Lutheran parents’ church anymore.  In the past nearly all the members of a church grew up in the church that their families had belonged to for generations.  In a case like St. Paul’s this was literally true, but even in areas where the population was more mobile, Lutherans usually married Lutherans and worshipped in Lutheran churches.  And this was true for other denominations as well.  As children came along they were thoroughly indoctrinated in the beliefs of their faith group.  Since social life was centered around activities of the church, people had little exposure to other beliefs and felt very secure in the belief that what they had been taught was the “TRUTH”.
 
Today, society and the church are very different…even for churches like ours.  Membership is made up of people from all kinds of backgrounds, including no religious background at all.  Even cradle Lutherans (or whatever denomination the people are) have beliefs that reflect exposure to other denominations or to a more secular culture.  In our modern age, political correctness, freedom from doctrine and an “all paths lead to God” tolerance are more important to many people than correct belief.
 
Thus, even publications from our national church suggest moving away from a focus on being Lutheran.  In many of our churches today, the lessons we read will even be exchanged for the lessons suggested in the Revised Common Lectionary.
 
I think this is very unfortunate.  Among other reasons, being grounded in a denomination’s history and traditions gives us roots.  While I feel concern when people are so attached to tradition that they can’t or won’t try anything new, being part of a group with a history can help us establish a sense of identity.  “I am a Lutheran, I am a member of the ELCA, I am a member of St. Paul’s Evangelical Lutheran Church, Drakes Mills.”  Each of those statements means something and says something about me.
 
And so, as long as I am the pastor, any church I serve will celebrate Reformation Sunday, even if I have to depart from the lessons appointed by the ELCA for that Sunday. 
 
On the other hand though, I did come across a word that in some ways better describes what Luther did when he challenged the Roman Catholic Church of the Middle Ages to correct certain false teachings.  That word is “Restoration”.
 
Though it can’t be denied that Luther tried with every gift he possessed to reform the Roman church, what he was really attempting and largely succeeded in doing, was to restore God’s people to the relationship promised in Jeremiah, declared in John and proclaimed in Romans.
 
Going back to an age long before Jeremiah, God made a covenant with his people.  God established a special relationship with them.  He would be their God and they would be His people.  He would love them and forgive them.
 
Over the many centuries of their history, Israel broke their part of the covenant repeatedly.  They followed other gods and suffered the consequences.  But, God was always faithful.  There was always another chance given.
 
In the time of the writing of Jeremiah, God was once again planning to discipline His people in order to bring them back to worship of Him alone.  Today’s lesson with its beautiful promise is set in the midst of a prophecy that Israel is about to be taken into exile again.  But, even as God through the prophet issues His dire warning, His love compels him to also issue a promise of a new chance at relationship in the future.
 
At some future date, when the people have learned their lesson God will restore them.  And this time, they won’t have to work at learning and remembering who their God is; that knowledge will be planted directly in their hearts.  This restoration was God’s grace in action.
 
Through the many up’s and down’s of their post-exilic history this grace continued.  God continued in covenant with His people.  Then, since keeping even this augmented covenant was beyond the people, God sent His Son.
 
All the people had to do was believe in the word Jesus declared.  God in His great love and grace had sent His own Son – a part of His own Godly Self – to restore the people to their covenant relationship with Him again.  This He would do by shedding His own blood as a sacrifice for their sin.  In the future, they would only need to remember this sacrifice to be forgiven.  This restoration was God’s grace incarnate.
 
But, people continued to sin, and one of their most grievous sins was falling back into belief that they could or needed to do something to earn God’s forgiveness.  The original sin still in them deluded them into thinking they could be good enough to do their own restoration of the covenant relationship.  Paul proclaims that just as they are all equally sinful, they are equally saved by God’s grace.  This restoration was by God’s grace alone. 
 
Then through the centuries following the establishment of the Christian Church, sin again led people away from that pure covenant of grace -  that relationship God offered so freely.  The system of prayer to saints, veneration of relics, the treasury of merits, sale of indulgences and salvation based on works developed.  The Church controlled people by keeping them terrified of the fires of hell and their certain condemnation to such a place if they dared deviate from what the church taught.  In a real sense, the Church replaced God as lord of people’s lives and hope of ultimate salvation.
 
It was in this state of broken covenant and denial of God’s grace that Martin Luther was born and grew up.  As Luther struggled with his fears of hell, first as a Law student and then as an Augustinian monk, he constantly sought something he could do to assure his salvation.  Finally, while studying for his doctorate he came across those life-giving words from Romans:  “For we hold that a person is justified by faith apart from works prescribed by the law.”
 
We know the rest of the story: how he sought a debate of his understanding by posting a notice on the church door, worked with Melancthon to write the Augsburg Confession, went to Worms to defend his position only to be condemned, was kept under protection by Prince Frederick. 
 
Yes, a new church did form around Luther’s understanding of God’s grace in Christ, but Luther’s intention was always the restoration of the people of God to their covenant relationship with God.  Reformation was meant to be restoration to the enjoyment of living in the presence of a God so loving that He was willing to die to have us back.
 
Since there is nothing we do to make ourselves deserving of restoration, we surely have no reason for self-righteousness, including any related to our having some kind of exclusive hold on the TRUTH.  The Truth not only makes us free from the Law and salvation by works, it also frees us from the need to prove that we have the TRUTH.
 
Instead, we celebrate being included in the covenant relationship first offered by God to Israel of old, the grace of God that justifies us through Christ and the freedom that knowing the Truth (Jesus Christ our Lord) brings.  And let us never cease giving thanks to God for leading Martin Luther to initiate the Reformation that led to our restoration with God.  Amen